Venture Capital: Best Practices for the Entrepreneur

I recently read an article about Venture Capital where the headline was “Know the Risks and Tell a Good Story“.  This is an excellent tagline for early-stage entrepreneurs to bear in mind when approaching VCs.

I think there are some basic nuts and bolts of how and when to approach VCs and add some empirical evidence that would compliment this article as well.

I’d like to begin with the overall strategy.  I meet too many first time entrepreneurs who think they have to sell the entire business plan and close the deal in an elevator pitch [or whatever the first pitch is].

Take a step back.  VCs meet thousands of entrepreneurs every year and invest in only a handful.  Its very easy for them to say “no”.  Very difficult for them to say “yes”.  The point of the elevator pitch is to get a full meeting.  Elevator pitches should be short and cover the following: “Who am I”, “What market am I in?” “Whats the solution”.  Show enthusiasm, but be grounded at the same time.  End with an offer to send an email with more info and ask for a business card.

OK, now you have met the VC and have his/her info.  Follow up within 24 hours.  Even if you’re final slide deck (powerpoint slides) are not 100% ready, you should thank the for their feedback in the elevator, and then outline how and when you will send materials.

When sending your slide deck to a VC, same rules apply for the elevator pitch: the point is to get a face to face meeting.  Your slide deck should be comprehensive, but not overly detailed to the point where if they do have you in, they can rip holes in something you sent them.  Keep it interesting and relatively short.  The VC has to review 50 other slide decks that afternoon, so all you want to do is convince them that you have thought through your business, have a solid team, and wouldn’t embarrass them if you come in to pitch to a partner.

They have invited you to pitch at their offices.  Congratulations, you are now the 1% of entrepreneurs who make it this far.  You show up and…..the partner is busy, so you’re meeting with his/her assistant/associate.  Don’t be disappointed or discouraged.  The associates are gatekeepers and will report back to their bosses how you presented.  The key here is to take the meeting as if you were meeting with a partner, and give the associate the chance to ask questions, and treat him/her like a rockstar.  Again, follow up is key.

If you get to present to the partner(s) at a VC, you want to convey that its a big problem (i.e. big addressable market), you have an unfair competitive advantage, and you have a scalable and efficient revenue model that leads to either an acquisition or IPO.

If you pass this meeting you will likely enter preliminary diligence where they will want to learn a lot more about your technology, your financials and your team.  If you have a solid plan (as a prominent Boston VC told me 2 years ago “you have to have 100/100 on [the VCs] checklist, then you can get funded), you have a good shot. That is if the VC is actively funding new companies, and if you hit their sweet spot of investment theses.

Of course every VC is slightly different, just as all entrepreneurs are unique as well.  This article is meant to provide basic guidelines on how to get in front of decision makers in Venture Capital firms.  The only way to get funded is to have a great team, great idea, and great market opportunity.  Luck and timing don’t hurt either.

Lastly, I’ll end with a quote from the article I read last week which prompted this post:

Gil Beyda, founder and managing partner of Genacast Ventures, a venture capital firm in partnership with Comcast Ventures, noted: “I like to paraphrase Thomas Edison, who said that genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration. To me, a startup is 1% a good idea and 99% perspiration and execution.” According to Beyda, while millions of people have good ideas, it is not about the idea; it’s about the execution.


Reflections from a Scientist-Entrepreneur in Boston

“We were young, but we had good advice and good ideas and lots of enthusiasm.”
- Bill Gates

The innovation ecosystem in Boston is a tremendous resource for entrepreneurs, especially scientific entrepreneurs.  The prevalence of a strong venture capital community, world-class research centers and a rich heritage of independence and innovation makes Boston an ideal setting for starting a company.  However the success of an entrepreneur is not as dependent upon location as it is passion, intelligence and perseverance.

In my experience as a graduate student/entrepreneur, I learned early to seize an opportunity when it is presented.  I came to Boston seven years ago to pursue my Ph.D. in Genetics at the Tufts Sackler Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.   While doing a lab rotation through the Pharmacology Department I met a fellow Ph.D. candidate who was a business-minded scientist and shared my passion for improving the drug development process.  Brigham Hyde and I became fast friends and started attending events at the Harvard Biotech Club and the MIT Sloan Healthcare Club on a regular basis to learn about the challenges facing the biopharma industry.  We felt compelled to address the big data and innovation opportunity in biopharma and established Relay Technology Management, Inc.

Organizations such as The Capital Network, MassBio, and The Startup Leadership Program are just three examples of the resources available in Boston that fostered a deep understanding of what it would take to start a company and close a Series A financing.  These organizations provide a foundation for entrepreneurs at any level to learn about starting a company, recruiting top talent, and creating a viable business model.  In addition to these resources, there are four key lessons that every entrepreneur should embrace: passion, networking, listening and perseverance.

Passion tends to come naturally to scientists.  Most scientists are developing technologies that they have personally worked on or have family members that would benefit from a specific medical technology.  The trick is for scientist-entrepreneurs to display a deep level of understanding of the subject while conveying an appreciation for the business aspect of the opportunity.  While many scientists may not feel that they are particularly charismatic or extroverted, this is a skill that can be attained through practice and is important for success.

The ability to network is the second key lesson that entrepreneurs should master.  The Mass Life Science Center (MSLC) provides a great resource for scientists who are looking for networking events around Boston and Cambridge.  MSLC has a weekly email blast that profiles networking opportunities for life scientists.  My own network has grown substantially over the past few years, and there has been a direct correlation between the size (and quality) of my network and the opportunities that arise from the network.  As Guy Kawasaki often posits, it is also important to be a mensch, essentially to give back to your network as a token of good faith.

Perhaps the most important lesson an entrepreneur can posses is the ability to listen effectively.  Surround yourself with the best scientists, business people and fellow entrepreneurs and listen to what they have to say.  Oftentimes scientists can develop a severe case of tunnel vision.  Your mentors and advisors should be individuals who you personally respect and can act as a sounding board when you have difficult issues that need outside attention.  In turn you should keep an open mind and listen carefully to their counsel.  For instance Relay’s business model underwent three major pivots before we hit our stride.  It is a delicate balance when deciding which advise to act on, and which advice to keep in mind down the road.  Active listening is a necessity for the successful entrepreneur.

Finally, the last key trait of a scientist-entrepreneur is perseverance in the face of uncertainty.  Rarely does success occur as planned and it is important to never give up.  If you have the perseverance to complete a graduate program in science you likely have the will and desire required to do well in business.

Scientist-entrepreneurs should leverage their strengths and engage team members who will work as a team.  As an entrepreneur you should always strive to know your strengths and work with individuals who complement your weaknesses.  If you concentrate on your goals, listen to outside counsel when appropriate and have a passion for your venture you will find that Boston is an amazing place to grow a business and realize your full potential as an entrepreneur.

Insights into Innovation and Investment

The National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) has produced an excellent video series entitled, “Insights into Innovation and Investment”, a series of video interviews with entrepreneurs, investors and others involved in university technology transfer and science startups. Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation, these videos are relevant to faculty and student innovators in science and engineering looking for insights on how to bring innovations into market.

I was interviewed on the following topics:

The Angel/VC Community

Importance of Team

Sources of Funding for Tech Startups

Student Perspective on Entrepreneurism

Speakers include:

Hambleton Lord
Managing Director at Launchpad Venture Group

Dave Greenwald
Co-founder and CEO of Relay Technology Management

David Verrill
Founder & Managing Director at Hub Investment Group, LLC

William Contente
Partner, Gessmer Updegrove and Chairman of the Board of Launchpad Venture Group

Robert Balke
Principal, E&E Capital and Former Fortune 100 Exec.

Dr. Susan Leschine
Professor of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst and Founder of Qteros, Inc.

Dr. Judith Giordan
Venture Founder, Investor, and Former Fortune 100 Executive

Katie Rae
Managing Director of TechStars Boston

Dr. Lawrence Friedman
Managing Director of the Energy Frontier Research Center at UMass Amherst and former External Relations and Innovation Head at Bayer Material Science

Ashley Stevens
Special Assistant to the Vice President for Research at Boston University

Dr. Linda Plano
Principal, Plano and Simple and former Assoc. Director of the Massachusetts Technology Transfer Center

Dr. Abigail Barrow
Founding Director of the Massachusetts Technology Transfer Center

-Anita Brearton
Managing Director, Boston Forum Leader at Golden Seeds

Study Finds Key Aspects of Effective Tech Transfer

The importance of effective and efficient technology transfer officers at academic research institutions cannot be understated.  Intellectual property generated within academia and research institutes can provide significant revenues for additional research and have an impact on human health by commercialization.

A recent study by Emily Hunter, Ph.D., who is an assistant professor of management and entrepreneurship at Baylor University’s Hankamer School of Business posits that “research Universities with an organization climate that actively supports commercialization and encourages interdisciplinary collaboration are more likely to produce invention disclosures and patent applications”.  Dr. Hunter’s findings were published in the Journal of Research Policy.

While the tech transfer office is still relatively nacent (Bayh-Dole was enacted in 1980) – the importance of these offices and their work has grown rapidly, and shows little signs of slowing down.  The basic foundations of effective technology transfer lie in submission of faculty and researcher invention disclosures and the resulting intellectual property.

“University-based inventors were more likely to generate more early-stage commercialization when they perceived an atmosphere that was supportive of commercialization and provided opportunities for collaboration which spanned the research boundaries of academic disciplines,” Hunter says. “We also found that a good organizational climate is more readily influenced by management than by other environmental factors such as the availability of venture capital.”

An important challenge for many technology transfer officers is educating their faculty and post-docs on the commercialization process and how to engage in the process in a meaningful and productive manner.  To this end there are an increasing number of resources such as the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) which holds seminars and workshops to facilitate commercialization of University-based technologies.

The Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) is the leading tech transfer professional network, and does a great job surveying the industry and providing guidelines and support for tech transfer offices at all stages of maturity and sophistication.

It is clear that tech transfer can positively impact many aspects of the innovation ecosystem by providing funding for future research, starting new companies, and supplying innovative solutions to difficult problems.

 

 

Business Plan Competition Overview for Entrepreneurs

Business plan competitions (BPCs) serve an important role in the innovation ecosystem and many have served as launching pads for successful companies and entrepreneurs.  There is a delicate balance that should be acknowledged when deciding which business plan competitions to participate in and how to maximize return on investment (ROI) on your most valuable asset – your time.

How to chose a business plan competition to participate in: 

Not all competitions are created equal.  From what I have experienced first hand as an entrepreneur, mentor and investor there are at least three broad categories of BPCs: 1) The top tier uber competitive, 2)The esoteric and 3) The rest.  As an entrepreneur you should focus as much time as possible on garnering first hand feedback from future customers, developing/refining the product, and generating revenue.  If you can achieve these three tenets of entrepreneurism, you will increase your chances of building a successful venture.

The top tier BPCs carry the name brand and are typically affiliated with an academic institution (e.g. MIT $100K Entrepreneurship Competition, Stanford $150K Entrepreneurship Challenge, Tufts Classical $100K Business Plan Competition).  As such, these BPCs draw top entrants from not only their respective communities, but occasionally clever entrepreneurs who have an idea and recruit an affiliated student or professor to join the team.  These BPCs are fiercely competitive and are judged by top venture capitalists and business academics and practitioners.

The esoteric BPCs are specific to regions, corporations, or social causes.  A great example is the $1,000,000 Global Startup Competition MassChallenge.  MassChallenge attracts top entrepreneurs and businesses to Massachusetts and creates a hub of innovation.  In the past two years over 1,000 companies and entrepreneurs have entered MassChallenge.  The quantity is equally matched by both the quality of the entrants and the resources that MassChallenge provides to its entrepreneurs.  Access to legal counsel, accounting, successful entrepreneurs such as Desh Deshpande and Josh Boger are invaluable to aspiring entrepreneurs and ventures.

When considering which BPCs to enter, entrepreneurs should weigh several factors including the reputation of previous winners, the quality of the sponsors/judges, the publicity factor of the competition, and the time investment required amongst other considerations.  Overall BPCs can be a great way to refine your plan and generate buzz.  A final quick note to entrepreneurs: the prize money should be the last reason why you enter a BPC – a successful venture generates revenue, not charitable contributions.

Dave